考研英语历年真题阅读要点之2015-Text 2（一）

 　各位同学，就考研英语真题而言，最后三套建议用来进行考前模拟。小编为大家梳理历年考研英语真题阅读文章中涉及的要点，包括词汇、短语、长难句以及简单的阅读方法。接下来看一下2015年考研英语真题阅读Text 2，这篇文章主要探讨了逮捕期间嫌疑人的智能手机内容应该得到法律保护。

　　Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.

　　constitution“宪法”;digital data“数据，数字资料”;the Supreme Court“最高法院”;consider“考虑”;whether“是否”;search“搜查”;warrant“正当理由，委任状”;arrest“逮捕，监禁”。

　　California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.

　　justice“法官”;refrain from“克制”;sweeping“广泛的”;ruling“裁决”;upset“颠覆，扰乱”;that引导同位语从句，解释说明其前抽象名词assumption“假设”;authority“当局，官方”;search through“搜遍”;possession“财物，所有物”;suspect“嫌疑人”;at the time of“在...的时候”;assess“评定”;implication“可能的结果，影响”。

　　The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernible, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.

　　recklessly“不顾一切地，毫无顾忌地”;modest“谦虚的”;advice“建议”;discernible“可辨别的，可识别的”;obvious“明显的”;so that“所以”;updated“现代化的”;guideline“指导方针”;defendant“被告”。

　　They should start by discarding California’s lame argument ... is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant... A smart phone may contain ... comprehensive records of recent correspondence...

　　discard“抛弃，丢弃”;lame“无说服力的，差劲的”;argument“论断”;be similar to“与...相似”;say“例如”;rifle“抢夺，偷走”，rifle through“搜寻”;violate“违反，侵犯”;amendment“修正案”;sift through“仔细查看”;arrestee“被捕者”;contain“包含”;comprehensive“综合的，全面的”;correspondence“通信”。