阅读综合辅导 [历史学类]
Between the eighth and eleventh centuries A. D., the Byzantine Empire staged an almost unparalleled economic and cultural revival, a recovery that is all the more striking because it followed a long period of severe internal decline. By the early eighth century, the empire had lost roughly two-thirds of the territory it had possessed in the year 600, and its remaining area was being raided by Arabs and Bulgarians, who at times threatened to take Constantinople and extinguished the empire altogether. The wealth of the state and its subjects was greatly diminished, and artistic and literary production had virtually ceased. By the early eleventh century, however, the empire had regained almost half of its lost possessions, its new frontiers were secure, and its influence extended far beyond its borders. The economy had recovered, the treasury was full, and art and scholarship had advanced. To consider the Byzantine military, cultural, and economic advances as differentiated aspects of a single phenomenon is reasonable. After all, these three forms of progress have gone together in a number of states and civilizations. Rome under Augustus and fifth-century Athens provide the most obvious examples in antiquity. Moreover, an examination of the apparent sequential connections among military, economic, and cultural forms of progress might help explain the dynamics of historical change. The common explanation of these apparent connections in the case of Byzantium would run like this: when the empire had turned back enemy raids on its own territory and had begun to raid and conquer enemy territory, Byzantine resources naturally expanded and more money became available to patronize art and literature. Therefore, Byzantine military achievements led to economic advances, which in turn led to cultural revival. No doubt this hypothetical pattern did apply at times during the course of the recovery. Yet it is not clear that military advances invariably came first. Economic advances second, and intellectual advances third. In the 860’s the Byzantine Empire began to recover from Arab incursions so that by 872 the military balance with the Abbasid Caliphate had been permanently altered in the empire’s favor. The beginning of the empire’s economic revival, however, can be placed between 810 and 830. Finally, the Byzantine revival of learning appears to have begun even earlier. A number of notable scholars and writers appeared by 788 and, by the last decade of the eighth century, a cultural revival was in full bloom, a revival that lasted until the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Thus the commonly expected order of military revival followed by economic and then by cultural recovery was reversed in Byzantium. In fact, the revival of Byzantine learning may itself have influenced the subsequent economic and military expansion. 2.【答案】B 3.【答案】B 4.【答案】D 5.【答案】C 把拜占庭军事、文艺以及经济上的复兴理解为同一现象的不同表现是合理的。毕竟,这三者在相当多的同家中是一同出现的。奥古斯都统治下的罗马和公元前五世纪的雅典就是古代社会最好的例证。而且,对三者之间次第出现的联系做一番考察也有助于解释历史变化的原因。 通常,对于拜占庭帝国中三者复兴的联系会这样解释:当帝国已击退敌人的进攻并反攻到敌国疆土之时,拜占庭的财富自然就会增长,从而有更多的金钱可用来投资于文化艺术事业。因此,帝国军事成就促进经济昌盛,后者又引起了文化繁荣。 毫无疑问,这种假设能够解释复兴中的一些现象。但是我们不能明确地认为军事成就一定最先出现,经济其次,文化最后。(事实上)860年左右拜占庭帝国开始收复阿拉伯人占领的失地,直到872年,和哈里发阿拉伯国家的军事对比才有利于帝国。而经济的复兴在810—830年间就已开始。文化的复兴更早,早在788年,一批有名的学者、作家就出现了,8世纪最后十年,文化复兴已达极盛,并一直延续到1453年君士坦丁堡的陷落。因此,通常所认为的军事、经济、文化复兴三者次第出现的顺序在拜占庭是完全颠倒的。实际上,拜占庭文化的复兴可能反而影响了后来的经济、军事进步。 |
热门资料下载: |
考研最新热贴: |
【责任编辑:聂荣 纠错】 |
|
阅读上一篇:考研英语阅读综合辅导——经济学类 |
|
阅读下一篇:考研英语阅读综合辅导——历史学类02 |
|
|
报考直通车 |
·2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语二真题汇总 |
·考研热升级:就业隐患引发考博热 |
·考研初试成绩3月可查 4月中旬开始调剂工作 |
·澳门大学公布新学年招生计划 招外地硕士生3成 |
·2010全国硕士研究生考试英语二真题及答案 |
·2010年考研英语真题及答案 |
·2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语一试题汇总 |
·2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语一试题(十一 |
·2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语一试题(十) |
·2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语一试题(九) |
·2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语一试题(八) |
·2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语一试题(七) |